|Title:||Recording installed projects|
|Author:||Petr Viktorin <encukou at gmail.com>|
|BDFL-Delegate:||Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com>|
- Rationale Change
- Standard and Changes Process
- Changes and their Rationale
- Deferred Ideas
This PEP clarifies and updates PEP 376 (Database of Installed Python Distributions), rewriting it as an interoperability standard. It moves the canonical location of the standard to the Python Packaging Authority (PyPA) standards repository, and sets up guidelines for changing it.
Two files in installed .dist-info directories are made optional: RECORD (which PEP 376 lists as mandatory, but suggests it can be left out for "system packages"), and INSTALLER.
Python packaging is moving from relying on specific tools (Setuptools and pip) toward a ecosystem of tools and tool-agnostic interoperability standards.
PEP 376 is not written as an interoperability standard. It describes implementation details of specific tools and libraries, and is underspecified, leaving much room for implementation-defined behavior.
This is a proposal to “distill” the standard from PEP 376, clarify it, and rewrite it to be tool-agnostic.
The aim of this PEP is to have a better standard, not necessarily a perfect one. Some issues are left to later clarification.
PEP 376's rationale focuses on two problems:
- There are too many ways to install projects and this makes interoperation difficult.
- There is no API to get information on installed distributions.
The new document focuses only the on-disk format of information about installed projects. Providing API to install, uninstall or query this information is left to be implemented by tools.
The canonical standard for Recording installed projects (previously known as Database of Installed Python Distributions) is the documentation  at packaging.python.org. Any changes to the document (except trivial language or typography fixes) must be made through the PEP process.
The document is normative (with examples to aid understanding). PEPs that change it, such as this one, contain additional information that is expected to get out of date, such as rationales and compatibility considerations.
The proposed standard is submitted together with this PEP as a pull request to packaging.python.org.
The standard is renamed from Database of Installed Python Distributions to Recording installed projects.
While putting files in known locations on disk may be thought of as a “database”, it's not what most people think about when they hear the term. The PyPA links to PEP 376 under the heading Recording installed distributions.
The PyPA glossary defines “Distribution” (or, “Distribution Package” to prevent confusion with e.g. Linux distributions) as “A versioned archive file […]”. Since there may be other ways to install Python code than from archive files, the document uses “installed project” rather than “installed distribution”.
All tool- and library-specific details are removed. The mechanisms of how a project is installed are also left out: the document focuses on the end state. One exception is a sketch of an uninstallation algorithm, which is given to better explain the purpose of the RECORD file.
References to .egg-info and .egg, formats specific to setuptools and distutils, are left out.
The .dist-info directory is allowed to contain files not specified in the spec. The current tools already do this.
A note in the specification mentions files in the .dist-info directory of wheels. Current tools copy these files to the installed .dist-info—something to keep in mind for further standardization efforts.
The CSV dialect is specified to be the default of Python's csv module. This resolves edge cases around handling double-quotes and line terminators in file names.
The “base” of relative paths in RECORD is specified relative to the .dist-info directory, rather than tool-specific --install-lib and --prefix options.
Both hash and size fields are now optional (for any file, not just .pyc, .pyo and RECORD). Leavng them out is discouraged, except for *.pyc and RECORD itself. (Note that PEP 376 is unclear on what was optional; when taken literally, its text and examples contradict. Despite that, “both fields are optional“ is a reasonable interpretation of PEP 376. The alternative would be to mandate—rather than recommend—which files can be recorded without hash and size, and to update that list over time as new use cases come up.)
The new spec explicitly says that the RECORD file must now include all files of the installed project (the exception for .pyc files remains). Since tools use RECORD for uninstallation, incomplete file lists could introduce orphaned files to users' environments. On the other hand, this means that there is no way to record hashes of some any files if the full list of files is unknown.
A sketch of an uninstallation algorithm is included to clarify the file's primary purpose and contents.
Tools must not uninstall/remove projects that lack a RECORD file (unless they have external information, such as in system package managers of Linux distros).
On Windows, files in RECORD may be separated by either / or \. PEP 376 was unclear on this: it mandates forward slashes in one place, but shows backslackes in a Windows-specific example.
The RECORD file is made optional. Not all tools can easily generate a list of installed files in a Python-specific format.
Specifically, the RECORD file is unnecessary when projects are installed by a Linux system packaging system, which has its own ways to keep track of files, uninstall them or check their integrity. Having to keep a RECORD file in sync with the disk and the system package database would be unreasonably fragile, and no RECORD file is better than one that does not correspond to reality.
(Full disclosure: The author of this PEP is an RPM packager active in the Fedora Linux distro.)
The INSTALLER file is also made optional, and specified to be used for informational purposes only. It is still a single-line text file containing the name of the installer.
This file was originally added to distinguish projects installed by the Python installer (pip) from ones installed by other package managers (e.g. dnf). There were attempts to use this file to prevent pip from updating or uninstalling packages it didn't install.
Our goal is supporting interoperating tools, and basing any action on which tool happened to install a package runs counter to that goal.
Instead of relying on the installer name, tools should use feature detection. The current document offers a crude way of making a project untouchable by Python tooling: omitting RECORD file.
On the other hand, the installer name may be useful in hints to the user.
To align with this new purpose of the file, the new specification allows any ASCII string in INSTALLER, rather than a lowercase identifier. It also suggests using the command-line command, if available.
The REQUESTED file is now considered a tool-specific extension.
Per PEP 376, REQUESTED was to be written when a project was installed by direct user request, as opposed to automatically to satisfy dependencies of another project. Projects without this marker file could be uninstalled when no longer needed.
Despite the standard, many existing installers (including older versions of pip) never write this file. There is no distinction between projects that are “OK to remove when no longer needed” and ones simply installed by a tool that ignores REQUESTED. So, the file is currently not usable for its intended purpose (unless a tool can use additional, non-standard information).
When possible, terms (such as name and version) are qualified by references to existing specs.
To limit the scope of this PEP, some improvements are explicitly left to future PEPs:
- Encoding of the RECORD file
- Limiting or namespacing files that can appear in .dist-info
- Marking the difference between projects installed directly by user request versus those installed to satisfy dependencies, so that the latter can be removed when no longer needed.
This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive.